Jump to content

Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
63,309 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 57,094 (90.2%) 
Undecided
  
 3,582 (5.7%) 
Declined
  
 2,633 (4.2%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
AquaAlien (talk) on 2026-05-15 06:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Selena Gomez
Used in:
Wikiproyecto:Selena Gomez
Reason:
I believe this to be the best portrait of Selena Gomez on WikiCommons. -- AquaAlien (talk)

Why ? they are many other candidates and this is here a pure matter of taste. I’m afraid this nomination will remain undecided.--Jebulon (talk) 19:30, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 12:39, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-16 08:15 (UTC)
Scope:
'Alstroemeria aurea' 'India Snow – flower

 Support Best in scope and used--Pierre André (talk) 15:22, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:22, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-17 06:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Clotilde on the beach - Valencia 1904
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:46, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-17 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Ilex aquifolium – Flower and leaves
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2026-05-17 15:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Elizabeth Rule
Used in:
Cesare Lombroso
Reason:
Another prisoner in the Newcastle prison in 1873. Restored. Convicted of stealing clothing and bed linen 5 times between 1867 and 1872. For these convictions she served a total of 11 months 14 days. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:39, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2026-05-17 18:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Pierre Soulé daguerreotype by Mathew Brady. Restored
Used in:
Pierre Soulé, Pierre Soulé
Reason:
He was french born, who emigrated to the United States, then elected US senator for Louisiana, then US ambassador to Spain. Interesting person. Very damaged original, difficult restoration with GIMP and FLOW. -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:39, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-18 05:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Armeria maritima splendens(Sea Thrift) – inflorescence

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:51, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I understand the species scientific name is always more definitive and precise, but inclusion of "Sea Thrift" common name in the scope would be helpful. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:04, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@GRDN711: Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Support with revised scope. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:39, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-18 05:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Lamium purpureum eating by Orthosia cerasi
 Comment The photo is not in scope. -- JackyM59 (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@JackyM59: Done, thanks...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:55, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Best in Scope and used -- JackyM59 (talk) 18:11, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Insect scope is confusing and too narrow with inclusion of the scientific names of two species. You must decide if you are nominating the caterpillar or the flower. Inclusion of a common name would also help meet COM:VIS scope guidelines for insect or flower scopes.
If the caterpillar, this this one looks better are prepresenting the Orthosia cerasi species to me. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:34, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2026-05-18 05:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Monodonta australis (Toothed Topsnail), shell
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:13, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2026-05-18 09:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Entrance to the Hable d'Ault Bird Sanctuary, view from Cayeux-sur-Mer (Fr)
Used in:
Hâble d'Ault
Reason:
The site is listed as a historic monument in France -- Pierre André (talk)

But I don't think the sign is worth a scope. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:52, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-18 14:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Clethrionomys glareolus (Bank vole)

Myodes glareolus is not the universally accepted latest taxonomy for the bank vole. While widely used in many European databases, recent authoritative sources—including the Mammal Diversity Database and the American Society of Mammalogists — have reverted to the older generic name Clethrionomys, making the widely accepted current scientific name Clethrionomys glareolus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:20, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-18 14:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Branta leucopsis (Barnacle geese) flock in flight
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-18 15:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Rattus norvegicus (Brown rat) eating
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2026-05-18 16:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Albert Edward, Prince of Wales in 1862 by Edwin Mayall
Used in:
Edward VII, Édouard VII
Reason:
Best in scope IMO for this portrait, restored by me, of the son, heir of queen Victoria of the United Kingdom, future king Edward VII, in 1862. See the file page for more informations. -- Jebulon (talk)

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:31, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2026-05-18 18:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Charles-Vincent by Nadar, restored
Used in:
, Charles Vincent (playwright), Charles Vincent
Reason:
Best in scope IMO. This was a very difficult restoration, but the subject deserved it. Please have a look on the original file. Very complete description. In use in several articles, french and english, plus wikidata -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-05-18 20:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Gate of the Count's Castle in Le Quesnoy - France, exterior seen from the northeast
Reason:
The building is listed as a historic monument in France -- JackyM59 (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2026-05-18 22:12 (UTC)
Scope:
MV Margaret’s Justice - IMO 9840635
Reason:
Best overall view of this RORO ferry by name that shows the ship in action as a local ferry in Digby Neck. -- GRDN711 (talk)
  •  Comment Agree there is more than one good image but I feel this one is best because the ship is moving on the water with a good view of the entire ship, rather than being stationary at the dock with partially blocked views. Also, as a ferry, the car deck is fully visible with this image rather than being blocked by the support wall. Further, while is it a double-ended ferry, this end is more the front end than the other. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:44, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2026-05-19 05:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Cellana pricei, shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-19 05:46 (UTC)
Scope:
18th Century Venetian 'Mirror' Gilded wood and glass, Fondation Bemberg Toulouse
 Comment The photo is not within the scope. -- JackyM59 (talk) 07:15, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@JackyM59: Oops Done, thanks...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-19 05:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Euphorbia amygdaloides inflorescence
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-05-19 07:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Town hall and belfry of Le Quesnoy - France, exterior seen from north
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-19 08:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Limosa limosa limosa (Black-tailed godwit) in flight (breeding plumage) showing wing upperside

 Comment You have another photo in higher resolution, but I'm not an expert.This one  Comment Thanks. That one shows wing underside. I've amended scope.

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-19 08:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Fringilla coelebs coelebs (Common chaffinch) female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-19 08:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Tringa totanus (Common redshank) breeding plumage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2026-05-19 16:54 (UTC)
Scope:
William Ballard Preston daguerreotype by Mathew Brady
Used in:
William B.Preston
Reason:
The restoration of the day. Again an old damaged daguerreotype by Mathew Brady. Please look at the c.1845 original for comparison. W.B.Preston was Secretary of the US Navy, then US Senator of Virginia, then CS Senator of the same Commonwealth after the Secession. -- Jebulon (talk)

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:33, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2026-05-20 05:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Brachidontes puniceus, right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-05-20 05:38 (UTC)
Scope:
The Toilet of a Sultana by Charles-Amédée Van Loo - Louvre Museum, Paris
Reason:
The only photograph -- JackyM59 (talk)

 Support Alone in scope !--Jebulon (talk) 12:17, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
— Yerpo Eh? on 2026-05-20 08:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Cankar Monument (Vrhnika)
Used in:
en:Monument to Ivan Cankar (Vrhnika), sl:Spomenik Ivanu Cankarju, Vrhnika, sl:Ivan Jurkovič (kipar)
  •  Best in Scope and used. Usually, a geographical indication is added, such as "view from the west, from the north," but in this case, I think there is only one viewpoint. -- JackyM59 (talk) 10:11, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-20 16:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Sturnus vulgaris (Common starling) male, breeding plumage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-20 16:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Calidris alpina alpina (Dunlin) non breeding plumage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-20 16:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Pyrrhula pyrrhula europaea (Eurasian bullfinch) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2026-05-20 17:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Athanase Coquerel (fils)
Used in:
wikidata (Q939011) and Athanase Josué Coquerel
Reason:
Best in scope IMO for this cleaned version of an old portrait by Nadar -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JPD115 (talk) on 2026-05-20 19:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Brivet, view from the bridge of D4 road, looking north-east.
Used in:
Brivet

 Best in Scope -- JackyM59 (talk) 09:52, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-05-20 20:17 (UTC)
Scope:
The Little Bather. Harem Interior by Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres - Louvre Museum, Paris
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2026-05-21 05:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Brachidontes puniceus, left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-21 05:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Stern lantern of a 16th century galley
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-21 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Gymnocalycium bayrianum young plant
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-05-21 11:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of Our Lady of the Assumption of Le Quesnoy - France, exterior seen from west
Reason:
The building is listed as a historic monument in France -- JackyM59 (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jebulon (talk) on 2026-05-21 17:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Frank Vincent (author) free interpretation after an old original.
Used in:
wikidata
Reason:
This is a free interpretation helped by AI of an old carte de visite portrait by Benjamin Falck, photographer from New York. The man is a famous american writer. Best in scope IM -- Jebulon (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2026-05-22 04:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Buttons of a Fraxinus excelsior. (European ash)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-22 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Cauliflory Cercis siliquastrum Cauliflory  : flowers and fruits
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2026-05-22 05:14 (UTC)
Scope:
La clairière ( The clearing ) by André Derain, Fondation Bemberg Toulouse

 Best in Scope and used -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:12, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-05-22 06:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Head of the great odalisque recumbent by Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres - Arts Museum of Cambrai

 Support best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 09:38, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JackyM59 (talk) on 2026-05-22 06:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Woman of Biskra by Marie Tonoir - Quai Branly Museum – Jacques-Chirac, Paris
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-22 09:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Coccothraustes coccothraustes (Hawfinch) male
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-22 09:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Coccothraustes coccothraustes (Hawfinch) female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2026-05-22 09:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Limosa limosa limosa (Black-tailed godwit) in flight, showing wing underside
Open for review.

I have added the following to the VI Nomination ProcedureːPlease ensure you have the FastCCI gadget enabled. You should use this to identify existing VIs with similar scopes. Note that if an image shows up as FP or QI it may also be a Valued Image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Closed valued image candidates

[edit]


Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Scope

[edit]
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=1198819023"